because
you can't
have
too much entertainment... October 2002
His
Mean Left Hook
Punch-Drunk Love
Dir: Paul Thomas Anderson.
Starring: Adam Sandler, Emily Watson, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, and
Mary Lynn Rajskub
Punch-Drunk
Love
Some
filmmakers start slowly and learn as they go. Some auteurs are infrequently
inspired but have one or two masterpieces in them. Some directors do sturdy
work but never create cinematic magic. But there are a select few who
start spectacularly well and accelerate famously to the top. They become
mythologized because their early efforts are so fully
realized. The myth of the wunkerkind in Hollywood filmmaking has
been around forever. Orson Welles wasn't the first or last young director
to ignite the screen with a fully formed aesthetic or narrative gift.
Spielberg
and Scorsese erupted in the 70s. Quentin Tarantino was the indie-fueled
mainstream discovery of the 90s. M. Night Shyamalan has recently been
anointed by some eager media types. But right about now, P.T. Anderson
is the one who is sitting pretty somewhere knowing (and rightly so) that
he is God's gift to the American cinema. He knows it in the same way that
Quentin Tarantino once understood his own vitality. But since Mr. Anderson
seems to be intent on making pictures rather than being an abstract celebrity,
it feels a lot more meaningful this time around.
Punch-Drunk
Love proves to be an extremely appropriate title for Anderson's fourth
outing. It has surprising swirls of violence, it veers around in a dangerous
fashion like an inebriated driver, but it's mostly a love story. To its
credit, all of the elements work in that same dangerous palette of feeling.
The jokes sometimes feel like jabs in the gut. And though Hollywood has
trained the audience to view the protagonist of any picture as their safe
zone, this picture won't allow that lazy comfort. There's no telling when
Barry Egan (Adam Sandler) will explode and smash something nearby -he
does so early in the picture. Yet once you get the hang of the movie's
furious rhythms, the off-kilter surprising narrative is really fun to
follow (it's a crying shame that many critics will spoil it for you).
Yet,
after the sprawling epic of Boogie Nights and the spiritual grandiosity
of Magnolia, it's hard to wonder if Punch-Drunk Love isn't
just a big time director blowing off steam. For the first time in
a P.T. Anderson picture, the acting takes a quiet backseat. No grand statement
seems to emerge. But however minor the picture may be, it comes together
in a major way. Beautiful
things happen all around in the choreography, cinematography, scoring,
and editing that suggest a filmmaking team led by a maverick at the top
of his game. Unlike
Soderbergh's summer entry Full Frontal (a similarly fast and loose
personal exercize from a top director), it feels very cohesive and supercharged.
Punch-Drunk
Love is
a little, but giddy, experiment that, perhaps appropriately, packs a big
punch. Though
it lacks the emotional weight and resonance of Anderson's previous
efforts, it is so blessedly itself that it becomes moving anyway.
When Barry and Lena (Emily Watson) embrace halfway through the picture
in a busy walkway I felt as carried away as the rush of the passersby,
swept off my feet and up into their sudden love. It wasn't the performances,
it wasn't the love, it was the energy of the filmmaking.
Given
that Love is inexplicably odd and has a rage-filled nature (even
the love story avoids sweetness and light), it will end up infuriating
many. It will have more detractors than Anderson's previous efforts. A
good litmus test might be the amphibious storm in Magnolia. Want
a whole picture like that? See Punch-Drunk Love! For those viewers
who barely made it through that film's musical number but exasperatedly
gave up hope when the biblical plague struck, P.T. Anderson's latest film
may
be Hell on Earth to
sit through. To tell the truth, I wasn't even sure from moment to moment
whether or not I liked it myself . But watching Punch-Drunk Love,
I perversely felt like my enjoyment was beside the point. The picture,
slight and bizarre as it is, is simply too vivid to dismiss. I have a
feeling that certain sequences are going to have staying power. And, you
see, Paul Thomas Anderson, with three terrific features under his belt,
has earned his right to show off a little. And show off he does. Armed
with a blatant disregard for convention, he has spectacularly honed his
lyrical gift for imaginative leaps into the beyond. If more American filmmakers
take his cue, Hollywood could reclaim its title as the dream factory in
no time.
-Nathaniel
Missed
some reviews or commentary? Go here